Romualdez’s bill seeks to lessen cancer deaths through early detection

Spread the love

Tacloban City–Leyte’s first district Congressman Ferdinand Martin G. Romualdez has filed a proposed law that aims to reduce cancer deaths among Filipinos through early detention programs.

His proposal is House Bill (HB) No. 7942, of which Tingog Party-list Rep. Jude Acidre is also
a principal author.

The bill is titled, “Strengthening cancer risk screening, profiling and awareness programs through the Department of Health, in partnership with local government units, barangay health workers and other stakeholders, and for other purposes.”

Citing data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), Romualdez said cancer consistently ranks among the top three leading causes of mortality in the country.

“A major factor contributing to this alarming reality is the late diagnosis of cancer cases, which not only reduces survival rates but also imposes severe financial hardship on affected families. Studies reveal that treatment of late-stage cancer can consume more than 30 percent of a household’s income, often pushing families into financial catastrophe,” Romualdez said.

In contrast, Romualdez said high-income countries report higher cancer incidence but lower mortality, owing to robust early detection and prevention programs.

“Evidence shows that early detection significantly improves survival rates while reducing overall treatment costs, making it both a life-saving and cost-effective public health strategy,” Romualdez said.

For his part, Acidre pointed out that the bill “seeks to institutionalize annual community-based cancer early detection programs through risk profiling, barangay-level screening, and awareness campaigns across municipalities.”

Acidre also proposed to strengthen the role of barangay health workers (BHWs) by providing capacity development and training, enabling them to effectively assist in cancer prevention, screening promotion, health navigation, and patient support.

“By integrating grassroots health workers into systematic cancer risk detection and awareness efforts, the State fulfills its mandate under the Constitution to protect and promote the right to health, while complementing the objectives of Republic Act No. 11215, or the National Integrated Cancer Control Act,” Acidre stressed.

Under the proposed Cancer Risk Screening and Awareness Act, the initial coverage of early detention programs are breast, cervical, colorectal (colon), and prostate cancers.

The Department of Health (DoH), upon recommendation of the National Integrated Cancer Control Council, may expand the list.

The DoH, in coordination with local government units (LGUs), provincial, city, and municipal health offices, barangay health centers, academic institutions, and other concerned agencies, is mandated to establish a comprehensive cancer risk profiling system nationwide.

Subsequently, a municipality- or city-wide cancer risk registry shall be created to record prevalence trends, screening results, and follow-up care. Patient confidentiality shall be strictly observed pursuant to Republic Act No. 10173, otherwise known as the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

The bill provides that the DoH, in coordination with LGUs, municipal or city health centers, BHWs and rural health units, shall conduct regular and periodic barangay-based cancer screening, free of charge or subsidized. Priority shall be granted to the indigent and high-risk population.

Health facilities conducting screening shall establish a referral mechanism to higher-level facilities for confirmatory diagnosis and treatment. Referral shall include linkage to PhilHealth benefits and other financial or logistical support services.

The proposed law also mandates the DoH, in collaboration with LGUs, civil society and professional medical associations to develop and integrate a culturally sensitive health education campaign on cancer risk factors and lifestyle prevention, early signs and symptoms of cancer, and importance of early detection and treatment adherence.

It calls for capacity development among BHWs, including training on cancer prevention and health promotion, screening assistance and navigation, psychosocial support, and referral pathways and linkage to financial assistance programs.

The DoH, in coordination with relevant agencies, shall issue implementing rules and regulations.

  • Related Posts

    Lawyer’s Mistake Kills Petition Against 5 Candidates

    Spread the love

    Spread the loveby Miriam G.Desacada Tacloban City–The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) En Banc tosses out petition against 5 candidates due to lawyer’s slip-up. Lawyer Lloyd P. Surigao failed to follow basic rules, including filing with the wrong office and missing payment proofs. The petition alleged candidates hid dismissal from office, but the En Banc dismissed it without reaching the merits. In a resolution signed by Chairman George Erwin M. Garcia, the Commission junked the petition filed by Atty. Lloyd P. Surigao against Ramon C. Oñate, Emmanuel M. Laurente, Consuelo J. Bonghanoy, Ranulfo O. Gaspan, Sr., and Jonathan T. Yap. Despite being a member of the bar, Atty. Surigao failed to comply with the most fundamental jurisdictional requirements set by COMELEC Resolution No. 11046. The Commission’s decision highlighted a series of procedural oversights that effectively “locked the door” on the case before it could even be heard. The Commission noted that while the law clearly mandates petitions be filed with the…

    OÑATE IS NOT GUILTY Court of Appeals nixes Encarnacion MR on its reversal of Ombuds ruling

    Spread the love

    Spread the loveBy Miriam G. Desacada Tacloban City–The Court of Appeals (5th Division) had denied Henry Encarnacion’s motion for reconsideration of its earlier ruling that reversed and dismissed the earliest decision of the Ombudsman in favor of his administrative complaints against then-mayor Ramon C. Oñate of Palompon, Leyte. On September 12, 2024, the Ombudsman upheld Encarnacion’s complaint against Oñate, finding the then mayor “guilty of conduct prejudicial to the interest of service and of simple neglect of duty.” But about two months later, the CA reversed and set aside the Ombudsman ruling, then dismissed it for lack of merit. This prompted Encarnacion to ask the CA to review its decision and to move for reconsideration. On 16 February 2026, the CA 5th Division, chaired by Associate Justice Ramon Cruz, denied Encarnacion’s motion for reconsideration because the petitioner’s issues raised in his motion merely reiterated “recycled and previously rejected arguments.” Both the CA’s reversal of the Ombuds ruling and the denial…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *